Thursday, April 13, 2023

Rabbi Ken Spiro, Adolf Hitler, and Hermann Rauschning

In Rabbi Ken Spero's video at AISH.org, "Why is there so much antisemitism," he cites quotes by Adolf Hitler that are, apparently, from Rauschning's "Hitler Speaks."


Rauschning's book of Hitler quotes is of dubious credibility.

Earlier, the only other source that used Rabbi Spero's Hitler quotes was Nizkor, which is of the same ideological bent as AISH.org

The AISH.org video:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FV2COCsedCw  accessed Aug 29 2015


April 9 2023:  Video PRIVATE at this date.

VIEWED Rabbi Ken Spiro here:  https://aish.com/96037069/
TRANSCRIPT of his 8:30 talk:




Hermann Rauschning

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermann_Rauschning

accessed Aug 29 2015

Hermann Rauschning
Hermann Rauschning.gif
3rd President of the Free City of Danzig Senate
In office
June 20, 1933 – November 23, 1934
Preceded byErnst Ziehm
Succeeded byArthur Greiser
Personal details
BornAugust 7, 1887
ThornPrussiaGermany
(now Toruń, Poland)
DiedFebruary 8, 1982 (aged 94)
Portland, Oregon, U.S.
Political partyNational Socialist German Workers Party (NSDAP)
Military career
AllegianceGerman Empire
Service/branchImperial German Army
RankLieutenant[1]
Battles/warsWorld War I
Hermann Rauschning (7 August 1887 – February 8, 1982) was a German Conservative Revolutionary[2] who briefly joined the Nazis before breaking with them.[3] In 1934 he renounced Nazi party membership and in 1936 emigrated from Germany (eventually settling in United States) and began openly denouncing Nazism. Rauschning is chiefly known for his book Gespräche mit Hitler(Conversations with Hitler), US title Voice of Destruction, UK title Hitler Speaks, in which he claimed to have had many meetings and conversations with Hitler.

Life and Works[edit]

Rauschning was born in Thorn (Toruń), at the time part of the German Empire, to a Prussian officer in the province of West Prussia. He attended the Prussian Cadet Corps institute at Potsdam and in 1911 he obtained a Doctorate from Berlin University. He fought in World War I as an Lieutenant[4] and was wounded in action.[1] After the war, he settled in the area around Danzig (now Gdańsk, Poland), where he owned land.
He lived in Posen[5] and was prominent in its Historical Society.[4] In 1930 he published a work under the title Die Entdeutschung Westpreußens und Posens (The de-Germanisation of West Prussia and Posen). According to Rauschning, Germans in these areas were constantly put under pressure to leave Poland.[4]
In 1932 he moved to a new estate in Warnow and became leader of the Danzig Land League. Previously affiliated with the German National People's Party, he then joined the Nazi Party believing that they offered the only way out of Germany's troubles, including the incorporation of Danzig into Germany.[6] He became President of the Danzig Teachers' Association in 1932. After Adolf Hitler came to power in Germany in 1933, the Nazis in Danzig won control of the Free City's government, and Rauschning became the President of the Senate of Danzig on 20 June 1933; that is, head of state of the Free City government. He was an excellent public speaker.[citation needed] In foreign matters Rauschning did not conceal that his personal desire was to turn neighbouring Poland into a vassal of Nazi Germany.[7] As a conservative nationalist Rauschning was not typical of Nazi members, and the Nazis' violent anti-Semitism was alien to him.[4] He was a bitter rival of Albert Forster, the future Gauleiter of Danzig.
On 23 November 1934, he resigned from the Senate and the Party. In the April 1935 Danzig elections, he supported "constitutionalist" candidates against the Nazis, and wrote articles supporting co-operation with the Poles, which angered the Nazis, and Rauschning found himself in personal danger.[4]
He sold his farming interests and fled to Poland in 1936.[8] He moved on to Switzerland in 1937, to France in 1938, and to the United Kingdom in 1939. Rauschning joined German emigres but his right-wing beliefs did not endear him to left-wing Germans, nor the fact that while a member of the Nazi Party he had been instrumental in the takeover of Danzig.[4] Rauschning represented "one of the most conservative poles of the emigration" and enjoyed celebrity status through his lectures.[9] He sought to play a leading role in the more conservative emigre 'German Freedom Party', run by Carl Spiecher (later of the Centre Party), however he fell out with Spiecher, who thought Rauschning was motivated by self-interest rather than the interest of the party.[4]
Between 1938 and 1942, he wrote a number of works in German addressing the problem of the Nazis which were also published in a number of languages including English. His Gespräche mit Hitler (Conversations with Hitler) was a huge bestseller but its credibility would later be severely criticised, and it now has no standing as an accurate document on Hitler for historians. However, as anti-Nazi propaganda it was taken seriously by the Nazi regime. At the beginning of the war the French dropped leaflets on the Western Front containing excerpts from Rauschnings writings, but with little response.[4]
In 1941 Rauschning moved to the United States, becoming a US citizen in 1942 and purchasing a farm near Portland, Oregon where he died in 1982. He remained politically active after the war and was opposed to the policies of Konrad Adenauer.[4]

Writings[edit]

Rauschning's writings that were translated into English deal with National Socialism and the Conservative Revolutionaries' relation to it, and their role/responsibility for Hitler gaining power. By conservative revolution Rauschning meant “the prewar monarchic-Christian revolt against modernity that made a devil’s pact with Hitler during the Weimar period”.[10] Rauschning came “to the bitter conclusion that the Nazi regime represented anything other than the longed-for German revolution”.[11]
In Die Revolution des Nihilismus (The Revolution of Nihilism) he wrote that "the National Socialism that came to power in 1933 was no longer a nationalist but a revolutionary movement"[12] and, as the books title states, a nihilistic revolution, destroying all values and traditions. He believed that the only alternative to Nazism was the restoration of monarchy.[13] His book went through seventeen printings in the United States[citation needed]. The book was directed at conservatives in Nazi Germany whom he hoped to warn of the alleged anti-Christian nature of the Nazi revolution.[14] He would reiterate the anti-Christian nature of Nazism in Gespräche mit Hitler.[citation needed]
Rauschning's ideas of conservative Christian resistance to Hitler met with increasing scepticism, and were of no interest to Winston Churchill and his doctrine of uncompromising total war.[15] He fared little better in the US where "extremists, like Henry Morgenthau argued for the radical dismemberment of the entire German nation".[16]
At the Nuremberg Trials the Soviet Union presented as evidence (USSR-378) two extracts from The Voice of Destruction.[17] Dr Pelckmann, for the defence, asked for Rauschning to be called as a witness on the matter of the party programme relating to the solution of the Jewish question and Hitler's "principle to deceive the Germans about his true intentions" so that the prosecution would have to prove that the SS "knew what Hitler actually wanted"[18] but Rauschning was not called.

Authenticity of Hitler Speaks[edit]

The authenticity of the discussions Rauschning claims to have had with Hitler between 1932 and 1934, which form the basis of his book Hitler Speaks,[19] was challenged shortly after Rauschning's death by Swiss researcher Wolfgang Hänel. Hänel investigated the memoir and announced his findings at a conference of the revisionist association Zeitgeschichtliche Forschungsstelle Ingolstadt in 1983.[citation needed]
In his biography of Hitler, Ian Kershaw wrote, "I have on no single occasion cited Hermann Rauschning's Hitler Speaks, a work now regarded to have so little authenticity that it is best to disregard it altogether."[20] Historian Richard Steigmann-Gall, in The Holy Reich: Nazi Conceptions of Christianity, also contends Hitler speaks an overall fake.[21]
Hänel declared that Gespräche mit Hitler (the German title of Hitler Speaks) was a fraud and that the book has no value "except as a document of Allied war propaganda"[page needed]. He concluded that Rauschning's claim to have met with Hitler "more than a hundred times" was a lie, that the two actually met only four times, and never alone, that words attributed to Hitler were simply invented or plagiarized from many different sources, including the writings of Ernst Jünger and Friedrich Nietzsche, and that an account of Hitler hearing voices, waking at night with convulsive shrieks and pointing in terror at an empty corner while shouting "There, there, in the corner!" was taken from a short story by French writer Guy de Maupassant (Le Horla).[page needed]
Hänel's evidence, he claims, was based on a tape-recorded interview that he had led in 1981 with Emery Reves, publisher of the original French edition of Hitler speaks who had commissioned the book from Rauschning in 1939. In this interview, Reves contended that penniless Rauschning's main reason for agreeing to write Hitler Speaks was the 125,000 francs advance, and, referring to preliminary talks with Rauschning in 1939 where he had agreed with the author on what themes and personality traits to apply to Hitler, considered it as largely fabrication.
The Encyclopedia of the Third Reich also considers that "the research of the Swiss educator Wolfgang Hänel has made it clear that the 'conversations' were mostly free inventions."[22]
Historian Hugh Trevor-Roper's initial view that the conversations recorded in Hitler Speaks were authentic[23] also wavered as a result of the Hänel research. For example, in the introductory essay[24] he wrote for Hitler's Table Talk in 1953 he had said:
"Hitler's own table talk in the crucial years of the Machtergreifung (1932–34), as briefly recorded by Hermann Rauschning, so startled the world (which could not even in 1939 credit him with either such ruthlessness or such ambitions) that it was for long regarded as spurious. It is now, I think, accepted. If any still doubt its genuineness, they will hardly do so after reading the volume now published. For here is the official, authentic record of Hitler's Table-Talk almost exactly ten years after the conversations recorded by Rauschning".[25]
in the third edition, published in 2000, he wrote a new preface in which he did revise, though not reverse, his opinion of the authenticity of Hitler Speaks:
"I would not now endorse so cheerfully the authority of Hermann Rauschning which has been dented by Wolfgang Hanel, but I would not reject it altogether. Rauschning may have yielded at times to journalistic temptations, but he had opportunities to record Hitler's conversations and the general tenor of his record too exactly foretells Hitler's later utterances to be dismissed as fabrication."[26]
The Hänel research was reviewed in the West German newspapers Der Spiegel[27] and Die Zeit in 1985.[28]
Other historians have not been convinced by Hänel′s research. David Redles criticized Hänel′s method, which he said consisted of
point[ing] out similarities in phrasing of quotations from other individuals in Rauschning's other books...and those attributed to Hitler in The Voice of Destruction [i.e. Hitler Speaks]. If the two are even remotely similar Hänel concludes that the latter must be concoctions. However, the similarities, which are mostly slight, could be for a number of reasons....[they] need not stem from Rauschning's attempt at forgery.[29]

Works by Hermann Rauschning[edit]

  • Musikgeschichte Danzigs, (Dissertation University of Berlin) Berlin 1911
  • Geschichte der Musik und Musikpflege in Danzig. Von den Anfängen bis zur Auflösung der Kirchenkapellen, Danzig 1931
  • As editor: Posener Drucke, erster Druck: Nicolaus Coppernicus aus Thorn. Über die Umdrehungen der Himmelskörper. Aus seinen Schriften und Briefen Posen 1923
  • Die Entdeutschung Westpreußens und Posens. Zehn Jahre polnische Politik, Berlin 1930. reprinted 1988 with the title Die Abwanderung der deutschen Bevölkerung aus Westpreußen und Posen 1919–1929.
  • 10 Monate nationalsozialistische Regierung in Danzig, (speech) Danzig 1934
  • Die Revolution des Nihilismus. Kulisse und Wirklichkeit im Dritten Reich, Zürich 1938 (US, The Revolution of Nihilism, Warning to the West, Alliance, 1939; UK, Germany's Revolution of Destruction, William Heinemann, 1939)
  • Gespräche mit Hitler, Zürich 1940 (US, The Voice of Destruction, G.P. Putnam's Sons, 1940; UK, Hitler Speaks. A Series of Political Conversations with Adolf Hitler on his Real Aims, Thornton Butterworth, 1940; France, Hitler m′a dit; Dutch Hitlers eigen woorden(by Menno ter Braak and Max Nord[30]))
  • Die konservative Revolution : Versuch und Bruch mit Hitler New York, 1941 (US, The Conservative Revolution, Putnam, 1941; UK, Make and Break With the Nazis – Letters on a Conservative Revolution, Secker and Warburg, 1941)
  • Die Zeit des Deliriums, Zürich 1947 (US: Time of Delirium D. Appleton-Century, 1946)
  • Deutschland zwischen West und Ost, Stuttgart 1950
  • Ist Friede noch möglich? Die Verantwortung der Macht, Heidelberg 1953
  • Masken und Metamorphosen des Nihilismus – Der Nihilismus des XX. Jahrhunderts, Frankfurt am Main / Wien 1954
  • ...mitten ins Herz: über eine Politik ohne Angst (with H. Fleig, M. Boveri, J.A. v. Rantzau), Berlin 1954
  • Die deutsche Einheit und der Weltfriede, Hamburg 1955
  • Ruf über die Schwelle. Betrachtungen, Tübingen 1955
  • Der saure Weg, Berlin 1958
  • Mut zu einer neuen Politik, Berlin 1959

References[edit]

  1. Jump up to: a b Wistrich, Robert Who's Who in Nazi Germany Bonanza (1984) p240
  2. Jump up ^ Stern,Fritz Richard The politics of cultural despair: a study in the rise of the Germanic ideology University of California Press reprint edition (1974)note to p297
  3. Jump up ^ Bosworth, R. J. B. Explaining Auschwitz and Hiroshima: History Writing and the Second World War Routledge (1994) p21
  4. Jump up to: a b c d e f g h i Andrzejewski,Marek Hermann Rauschning. Biographische Skizze (Hermannn Rauschning biographical sketch) in Gornig Gilbert (ed.), German-Polish meeting on science and culture, Societas Physicae Experimentalis, Series of Gdansk Scientific Society, Volume 5, 2001, pp. 170–185
  5. Jump up ^ Brockhaus Enzyklopädie, last printed edition 2006, vol. 22 p. 578
  6. Jump up ^ Brockhaus Enzyklopädie, recent printed edition 2006, Vol. 22 page 578
  7. Jump up ^ Gdańska polityka Józefa Becka, Bogdan Dopierała,page 86, Wydawnictwo Poznańskie, 1967
  8. Jump up ^ Loew, Peter Oliver (2011). Danzig – Biographie einer Stadt (in German). C.H. Beck. p. 205. ISBN 3406605877.
  9. Jump up ^ Palmier, Jean Michel Weimar in exile: the antifascist emigration in Europe and America Verso (2006) p569
  10. Jump up ^ Neaman, Elliot Yale A dubious past: Ernst Jünger and the politics of literature after Nazism University of California Press (1999) p71
  11. Jump up ^ Bullivant, Keith The Conservative Revolution in Phelan, Anthony (ed) The Weimar dilemma: intellectuals in the Weimar Republic Manchester University press (1985) p66
  12. Jump up ^ Rauschning, Hermann The Revolution of Nihilism, Warning to the West (1939) p16
  13. Jump up ^ Rauschning, Hermann The Revolution of Nihilism, Warning to the West (1939) p170-172
  14. Jump up ^ Conway, J.S. Hermann Rauschning as Historian and Opponent of Nazism Canadian Journal of History Vol 8, No 1 (1973) p69-70
  15. Jump up ^ Conway, J.S. Hermann Rauschning as Historian and Opponent of Nazism Canadian Journal of History Vol 8, No 1 (1973) p74-76
  16. Jump up ^ Conway, J.S. Hermann Rauschning as Historian and Opponent of Nazism Canadian Journal of History Vol 8, No 1 (1973) p77
  17. Jump up ^ The Trial of German Major War Criminals by the International Military Tribunal sitting at Nuremberg Vol 7 (1946) p29
  18. Jump up ^ "Nuremberg Trial Proceedings Volume 19 p260". Avalon.law.yale.edu. Retrieved 2012-08-31.
  19. Jump up ^ #HitlerSpeaks1939
  20. Jump up ^ Kershaw, Ian (1998). Hitler, 1889–1936: Hubris (1st ed.). London: Penguin PressISBN 0-7139-9047-3. Text "xiv" ignored (help)
  21. Jump up ^ Richard Steigmann-Gall, The Holy Reich: Nazi Conceptions of Christianity, 1919–1945, Cambridge University Press, p. 29
  22. Jump up ^ Bedürftig, Friedemann; Zentner, Christian (1997). The Encyclopedia of the Third Reich. New York: Da Capo Press. p. 1162. ISBN 0-306-80793-9.
  23. Jump up ^ A view held by some other notable historians of the period in the 35 years following the end of World War II including Alan Bullock, Joachim Fest, and Robert Payne
  24. Jump up ^ "The Mind of Adolf Hitler"
  25. Jump up ^ Hitler, Adolf (1973). Bormann, Martin, ed. Hitler's Table Talk 1941–1944. trans. Cameron, Norman; Stevens, R.H. Preface and Introduction: The Mind of Adolf Hitler by H.R. Trevor-Roper (2nd ed.). London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson. p. xiv. ISBN 0-297-76584-1.p.xiv
  26. Jump up ^ Hitler, Adolf (2000). "Preface". In Bormann, MartinHitler's Table Talk1941–1944. trans. Cameron, Norman; Stevens, R.H. Preface and Introduction: The Mind of Adolf Hitler by H.R. Trevor-Roper (3rd ed.). London: Enigma. ISBN 1-929631-05-7.
  27. Jump up ^ Malanowski, Wolfgang (1985-09-09). "Zitat, Zitat, Zitat, und nichts weiter (Quote, quote, quote, and nothing more)" (Online archive of press articles)Spiegelwissen (in German) (SPIEGEL-Verlag Rudolf Augstein). Spiegel Online. pp. 92–99. der Spiegel 37/1985. Retrieved June 2, 2009.
  28. Jump up ^ Janßen, Karl-Heinz (1985-07-19). "Kümmerliche Notizen. Rauschnings "Gespräche mit Hitler" – wie ein Schweizer Lehrer nach 45 Jahren einen Schwindel auffliegen ließ" (Online article) (in German). Zeitverlag Gerd Bucerius. Zeit Online. Retrieved Aug 29, 2011.
  29. Jump up ^ Redles, David (2008). Hitler's Millennial Reich: Apocalyptic Belief and the Search for Salvation. NYU Press. p. 195. ISBN 9780814769287.
  30. Jump up ^ Dewulf, Jeroen (2010). Spirit of Resistance: Dutch Clandestine Literature During the Nazi Occupation. Camden House. p. 30. ISBN 9781571134936.
  • Rauschning, Hermann (1990) [1930 (Berlin, R. Hobbing)]. Die Entdeutschung Westpreussens und Posens : zehn Jahre polnischer Politik (in German) (Reprint ed.). Verl. für Ganzheitliche Forschung und Kultur. p. 405. ISBN 3-922314-96-1OCLC 5452961.

Saturday, October 22, 2022

Iran from Above

 




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5fY8BVwsLMA





Saturday, August 27, 2022

Russian Jewish migration to US post Cellar act

video: (viewed Aug 27 2022, linked from Unz https://www.unz.com/ghood/laura-loomer-loses-narrowly/#comment-5513626


 https://www.bitchute.com/video/hHYRXTwAvGPD/


TRANSCRIPT: 

Paying the Organizatsiya

orgby Dr. William L. Pierce

ILLEGAL immigration is a huge and growing problem for this country. So is legal immigration, to the extent that the immigrants are nearly all members of minority groups these days. Immigration is changing the complexion and the character of America. We are becoming less European and more Middle Eastern, Asian, African, and Mestizo. I have spoken on earlier programs about what this non-White immigration is doing to our schools and our cities and our tax burden. Let’s look today at some of the other costs involved.

You know, back before the Second World War we had immigration laws which ensured that most immigrants to the United States were Europeans. It was extremely difficult for Asians or Africans or other non-Whites to enter the country. Then in the rush of feel-good egalitarianism and yankee-doodle democracy which were promoted by the media after the war, the members of the liberal elite let themselves be persuaded by the media bosses that our immigration policies were “racist.” What we needed in America was more “diversity,” they decided. A Jewish congressman from New York, Emanuel Celler, headed the drive in the Congress for a new immigration law which would favor the Third World instead of Europe, and in 1965 such a law was passed, with the co-sponsorship of Massachusetts Senator Edward Kennedy.

Of course, at the time the Jews and the liberals were campaigning for their new immigration law they didn’t advertise it as a law which would change America’s complexion. They didn’t talk of it as a diversity-enhancing law. Quite the opposite, in fact, because in 1965 the masters of the controlled media hadn’t had time yet to make diversity fashionable among ordinary Americans. Television was still relatively new and hadn’t worked its magic yet.

People who wanted to maintain America’s European racial character foresaw the effect the new law would have and argued against it on that basis, but its proponents deceitfully claimed that it wouldn’t change America’s racial character at all, knowing full well that it would. And so the law was passed, and since it went into effect in 1965 most of the legal immigrants to the United States have been non-European, non-White. So have nearly all of the illegal immigrants. And America’s racial complexion has changed drastically as a result. In the last census taken before Emanuel Celler’s new immigration law — the census of 1960 — the population of the United States was 89 per cent White. In the 1990 census, after 25 years with the new law, the White percentage of the population had fallen to 76 per cent. Actually, the situation was worse than that, because illegal immigrants, nearly all of whom are non-White, tend to avoid the census-takers. And the percentage of Whites in the United States has continued to plunge since 1990. Today the country is somewhere between 70 and 75 per cent White.

Occasionally Congress has made special modifications to the 1965 immigration law to admit favored groups of immigrants. The largest such group is from Europe but actually is not racially European. It consists of Jews from the former Soviet Union claiming “refugee” status. A Jewish legislator, New Jersey’s Senator Frank Lautenberg, succeeded in 1989 in having Soviet Jews officially designated as a “persecuted minority” in the Soviet Union and therefore eligible for admission to the United States without regard to regular immigration quotas.

As a matter of fact Jews in the Soviet Union, far from being persecuted, have been a favored race ever since the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917 — a revolution which they in large part engineered. While communism ruled in Russia, Jews were far more often persecutors of Russians than the other way around. But in 1989, with Russia bled dry and communism on the brink of collapse, Soviet Jews decided to find a new host. And so for the past nine years, whereas it has been nearly impossible for a real Russian or Ukrainian to become a U.S. immigrant, Jews from the former Soviet Union have been pouring into the United States at a rate of about 50,000 a year. Furthermore, as “refugees from persecution,” Soviet Jews are given a cash handout from the U.S. Treasury and various other Federal subsidies as soon as they arrive.

Whenever anyone has dared to question why Soviet Jews continue to be exempt from the immigration laws which apply to everyone else, he is likely to be charged with “anti-Semitism.” And the claim will be made that these Soviet Jews are a very clever and skilful bunch of people who contribute greatly to America’s economy, and we’re fortunate to have them in the country.

Not really. They are clever, all right, but the only economy they contribute to is their own, and it’s at the expense of the rest of us. Soviet Jewish immigrants in the United States have been a far larger per capita burden on White Americans than any other immigrant group. A substantial part of this burden is due to the fact that a great many of these Soviet Jews are gangsters: members of a global organized crime network, which they call the “Organizatsiya”: the “Organization.” Under communism, Jews controlled organized crime in the Soviet Union, and when communism collapsed at the beginning of this decade Soviet Jewish gangsters not only branched out into various new money-making enterprises in Russia and Ukraine, including the White slave trade, they also began building their criminal operations in the United States and in Western Europe. They virtually control organized crime in Germany, Poland, and several other European countries today. And the Organizatsiya has replaced the Italian and Sicilian Mafia as the principal organized crime element in the United States. And these Jews from the former Soviet Union are far more predatory than the Mafia ever was. They suck far more blood from law-abiding Americans.

Three or four years ago they made the headlines with their gasoline-tax rackets in New Jersey and New York, where a handful of Jewish gangsters from Russia were stealing an estimated $1.5 billion a year from these two states alone. More recently they’ve come into the news in connection with automobile insurance fraud in California. They hire people, hundreds of people every week, to participate in staged automobile accidents, and then, using their own lawyers and their own clinics for treating the alleged injuries in the accidents, they collect from the insurance companies.

Now, anyone can do this sort of thing, and as a matter of fact Chinese, Vietnamese, and Mexican gangs had been engaging in automobile insurance fraud before the Organizatsiya became involved, just as the Mafia had been stealing gasoline taxes in New York and New Jersey before the Soviet Jews made a multi-billion-dollar racket out of it. When the Jews moved into insurance fraud recently, however, they did so on a massive scale, converting what had been a minor irritation to a huge drain on the pocketbook of nearly every American. Automobile insurance fraud is currently sucking nearly $20 billion a year from the American economy and is costing the average American household an estimated $300 per year in additional insurance payments — because, of course, every dollar paid to a Jewish gangster as a result of a fraudulent automobile accident comes from the pockets of all the people who are obliged to buy automobile insurance. This is an enormous racket, and it dwarfs anything that the Mafia used to do.

And gasoline-tax fraud and automobile insurance fraud are by no means the only rackets that Soviet Jewish immigrants have moved into. In New York, Los Angeles, and other port cities their presence has substantially increased the likelihood that your car will be stolen, for example. They control gangs of thieves who steal expensive cars off the street, and then the Jews arrange for the cars to be shipped in freight containers to other Jewish gangsters in the Middle East, where they can be sold for much higher prices than in the United States — and where they will never be recovered by the police. As with the other rackets, the Jews aren’t the only organized criminals who steal cars, but they do it on such a large scale that they run insurance rates up much higher than all of the non-Jewish auto thieves together.

There are perhaps 400,000 Soviet Jewish immigrants in the United States, most of them in the New York and Los Angeles areas, and only about 4,000 of these Jews belong to organized crime gangs, or about one per cent. But the infrastructure for these Jewish gangs is the entire Soviet Jewish community. They could not function without all of the other Jews who make up the community within which they live.

Don’t let yourself be misled by the argument that 99 per cent of Soviet Jewish immigrants to the United States are not gangsters. The bottom line is that these Soviet Jewish immigrants, gangsters or not, are draining about $50,000 per capita per year from the American economy as a result of Jewish organized crime activities in the United States. It may be only one per cent of them who are actively engaged in the rackets, but we wouldn’t have Jewish organized crime gangs in the United States sucking money from all of us if we didn’t have Soviet Jews in the United States. And we wouldn’t have Soviet Jews in the United States if we had a sane immigration policy.

The United States is still nearly three-quarters White, but most of the crime in the United States is committed by non-Whites. In some cases we may overlook this non-White crime because it doesn’t impact on us directly. For example I have a news story in front of me now about a Mexican gang which operates a sex-slave racket in the southeastern United States. The gang members force Mexican girls, some as young as 14, to work as prostitutes in a chain of brothels they own in Florida and South Carolina, which cater mostly to illegal Mexican aliens doing farm work in this country. This may be dismissed as a case of non-Whites committing crimes against non-Whites which doesn’t cost us anything, but as long as it is happening on our turf we should be concerned about it. If we permit non-White moralities, non-White attitudes toward women, non-White concepts of propriety and proper behavior to flourish here, they eventually will take root here and will infect White Americans, just the way Black life-styles began influencing young Whites after our schools were racially integrated. We cannot have growing communities of Chinese, of Vietnamese, of Haitians, of Mexicans, of Soviet Jews, and of a hundred other alien races springing up all across the United States, taking over our cities, spreading into our suburbs, and still have any realistic hope of maintaining White values and a White morality as the basis of our own community life. The poison eventually will infect us, sicken us, destroy us.

This is in no case more true than with the Soviet Jewish gangs which have established themselves here during the past decade. When the Organizatsiya decides to move into an area of criminal activity, whether it be gasoline-tax fraud or insurance fraud or exporting stolen cars, they do it efficiently and in an organized way which dwarfs the activity of other criminal gangs and typically brings them billions of dollars in loot and makes it possible for them to engage in bribery and political corruption on a massive scale. Bill Clinton accepts political donations from them, and you can be certain that police chiefs, mayors, and other politicians and public officials do too. No government, even one which initially is honest, can remain uncorrupted by the sort of money these organized Jewish criminals have at their disposal.

And of course, the controlled media cover for them. When, occasionally, the newspapers are forced to report on some Organizatsiya racket, the criminals are never referred to as Jews. Instead they are called “Russians.” The media customarily refer to the Organizatsiya as the “Russian mafia.”

One other reason why the activities of the Organizatsiya ought to be of special concern to us is that we are their chosen victims. Mexican gangs often confine their activities to their own people, as in the case of the sex-slave gang I mentioned. Vietnamese and Chinese gangs also tend to focus on extortion and other rackets which victimize their own people. Of course, when these non-White immigrant gangs engage in the drug business, many White Americans end up as victims. But the Jewish gangs deliberately choose us as their victims from the beginning. Part of the reason is that they want money on a much larger scale than they can extract from their fellow immigrants. They’re not interested in a paltry few million dollars. They want — and they get — billions, and it’s from the American majority they get it, whether they’re fleecing the stock market à laMichael Milken and Ivan Boesky or running our auto insurance premiums up through organized fraud.

And part of the reason they choose White Americans as their victims is that they believe they have a God-given right to plunder us. Whenever they immigrate into a non-Jewish country, whether it is ancient Egypt 3500 years ago or America today, their imperative is the same: “Ye shall eat the fat of the land,” their Torah commands them: “Thou shalt suck the milk of the Gentiles.”

You know, it is a difficult thing, a painful thing, for most Americans to face this problem of non-European immigration into America. Most Americans want to be nice, they want to be polite, they don’t want to give offense. And because of this inherent politeness we have, we let ourselves be buffaloed by those clamoring for more “diversity.” If there’s one thing America doesn’t need, one thing which is pure poison to America, it’s more “diversity.” But the Jews of Hollywood and Madison Avenue have done a very effective job of selling the notion to an impressionable and easily manipulated public that it’s “nicer” and more “tolerant” and more “open-minded” and “fairer” to be in favor of letting non-Europeans — including Soviet Jews — continue pouring into America. A great many of us understand that we don’t want any more non-Whites or any more Jews in America — in fact, we don’t want the ones that already are here — but we feel an enormous pressure to smile, to be nice, and not to object to what is happening to our country. We are afraid to stand up against the propaganda of Jewish television and Jewish magazine advertisements and Jewish films: propaganda that tells us more “diversity” is good for us, even when we know that it isn’t.

Their propaganda, their pressure, is pervasive; it is everywhere. I just finished viewing a Jewish film about the history of the Hollywood film industry. The name of the film is Hollywoodism. It openly discusses what everyone knew but was afraid to speak of openly for fear of being denounced as an “anti-Semite”: namely, that Hollywood and the motion-picture industry are almost completely Jewish. The film talks about the Jews who came to America from Russia and other areas of eastern Europe early in this century and took over the fledgling motion-picture industry in Hollywood, elbowing most of the non-Jews out. The film claims that these immigrant Jews reinvented America for us. They cooked up an image of what they wanted America to be like — more diverse, more democratic and proletarian, more vulgar, with lots of Black music and other elements of Black culture mixed into our culture — and then they sold that image to the American people, first through cinemas and later through television. They persuaded White Americans that this Jewish image of America was a better image than our own. The Jews boast of this transformation of America they made through their control of the motion-picture and television industries.

If you haven’t seen this film, you still can read the book it is based on. The book is Neal Gabler’s An Empire of Their Own: How the Jews Invented Hollywood.

As I said, it is very difficult for the average American to stand up against this flood of Jewish propaganda which clamors for ever more “diversity” and intimidates most of those who would like to stop the flow of Haitians and Chinese and Vietnamese and Soviet Jews into America. As long as White Americans still have the option of moving to a Whiter neighborhood or sending their children to a Whiter school, they’ll choose that option rather than make a fuss and be considered rude by speaking out against the insane immigration policies of the government in Washington. It’s too bad we’re that way. It just means that our future will be much bloodier and more painful than necessary.

Meanwhile it will be good for us to remember every time we pay our automobile insurance that one consequence of non-White immigration into America is the size of our premiums. It will be good to remember that a third of every premium pays just for insurance fraud, and that virtually all automobile insurance fraud is perpetrated by gangs of non-White immigrants, a growing number of whom belong to the Organizatsiya. If you are paying, say, $800 a year in automobile insurance, then between $250 and $300 of your hard-earned money is going directly into the pockets of grinning Soviet Jewish gangsters, courtesy of the U.S. Congress. Think about it, sucker!

* * *

Source: American Dissident Voices broadcast of May 16, 1998


First published at 12:03 UTC on July 30th, 2021.
    channel image
      

    Written Transcript: https://nationalvanguard.org/2016/09/paying-the-organizatsiya/
    Recording of Dr. William Luther Pierce from the Power of Truth CD series; available here for purchase: https://cosmotheistchurch.org/product-category/cds/

    Visit:


    https://nationalvanguard.org/2016/09/paying-the-organizatsiya/

    Saturday, April 9, 2022

    The Real Victors of WWII

    Israel is Rothschild 


    https://www.bitchute.com/video/t00j5F5Ny6mg/



    Tuesday, March 29, 2022

    Italian journalist in Mariupol, Mar 28 ? 2022

     https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qsqKtqJlz4o


    Hello everyone, at the moment I am editing the footage taken in recent days in Mariupol, and in the meantime I am reading the news in the telegram. Looking at what is happening in Italy, I felt the need to say a few words. I don't know if I can find the right words to describe what's going on, but I have to say something. The spectacle, originating in Italy, is grotesque. They are arguing about the fourth or fifth dose of the vaccine, if it is better to do it now or in the fall, at a time when we are on the verge of a third world war. and then there are those who talk about the fourth doses of the vaccine, masks for children. In TV programs we see presenters who walk around the studio in a mask .. Since I arrived in Russia, I don’t even know where I put the mask. I go in and out of hospitals, hug people, eat from the same plate with them. I see people cooking on the street and in Italy they are talking about the fourth dose of the vaccine, it's crazy. And yet, these people hope for the Third World War, speaking of civilization. But I believe that we never had a civilization. We will never be able to defeat these people, because we are already nothing. I see people on TV talking about modernity, about morality, they say that Putin is a criminal. There is neither before nor after, but only now: Putin is a criminal. If Putin is a criminal, then we are 10 times worse. These days are the anniversary of the destruction of Belgrade by Deputy Prime Minister Mattarella, Prime Minister of the Communist D'Alema. Tons of bombs have been dropped on the European capital, over civilians, based on fake news. It is also fashionable to recall Iraq, Syria, Libya, Afghanistan. But if you remind them of all this, they will not want to hear about it. If Putin is a criminal, then Bush father and son, Obama, Blair, Clinton, Mattarella are criminals. It needs to be said! Nations and powers do what needs to be done - they don't do it like in Italy, where we discuss sanctions, Netflix or the disqualification of an oak in a competition to annoy Russia. Someone even suggested lowering the heating to 18 degrees ... This is a crazy world where you have lost touch with reality. You are fighting bullshit against tanks and bombs, Russia will not retreat back. She doesn't lose, she wins. She is moving forward according to plan, not in a hurry. They didn't wake up a month ago with the thought: what to do today? Let's invade Ukraine! We weren't ready for this. The plans were made by the Americans and Russians. Italians, Germans, Austrians and Ukrainians, who didn't know what was going to happen, were drawn into it, controlled by a lunatic who doesn't control anything: an actor playing a part. He does not control the neo-Nazi battalions. I stop people randomly and interview them. They all tell me they were locked in the basement and couldn't get out. They were told everything was under control. Many say they shot at them to keep them from leaving. They emptied the apartments to bring people down, when they themselves remained in the apartments to shoot. These are neo-Nazi battalions. And then I read on the Washington Post that these militants read Kant ... I went to their former bases, where I saw swastikas, books about the SS, books about Mussolini .. Then they tell us about Casapound or New Force (nationalist organizations in Italy), when there are real Nazis who are being held hostage state. A state that ceased to be democratic in 2014 as a result of a neo-Nazi coup. There is no democracy in Ukraine. The so-called pro-Russian President Yanulovich was the last democratically elected president. And he was not pro-Russian, because if he was, he would have repressed the Maidan, would have destroyed the neo-Nazis. He wasn't pro-Russian because he didn't. Since then, the country has been in the hands of neo-Nazis and oligarchs. Such a result. Then they roll around the world of an actor, artist and comedian from the series, whose words are empty - there is nothing true in them. The truth is that we are killing ourselves for NATO. Russia has no problems, it can take its time. It has grain, wheat, raw materials, oil, gas, vast and sparsely populated territory. Doesn't need space. She can stand there and wait while we go to collect firewood and bask in public parks. What else is needed to understand what is happening?


    Wednesday, March 16, 2022

    The Puppets Who Lead Us == Comparing AOC and Zelensky

     

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qZezuZyVFcY


    Kolomoisky created Zelensky: astroturfed his 'success' as an actor, then created a political party named after the TV series Zelensky starred in.

    Zelensky is kept "coked up."



    The Puppets Who Lead Us